The PSP division is actively involved in public policy and legislation issues that directly affect our members.
Access to Journals
- Letter to Reps. Michael Burgess and Peter DeFazio thanking them for introducing the Protect Continuing Physician Education and Patient Care Act, H.R. 293
The letter was signed by AAP/PSP and 76 other organizations that support the provision exempting medical textbooks and peer-reviewed journals from reporting requirements under the Sunshine Act.
- Letter from AAP/PSP to Chairman Fred Upton, Ranking Member Frank Pallone and Rep. Diana DeGette.
The letter thanks them for including a provision in their draft of the 21st Century Cares Act exempting textbooks and peer-reviewed journals from burdensome reporting requirements.
- Letter to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in Opposition to the Federal Research Public Access Act H.R. 4004
- Letter to Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs in Opposition to the Federal Research Public Access Act S. 2096
- Letter to Francis Collins, NIH Director, by House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Health Chairman Joe Pitts
The letter expresses concern that the NIH Public Access Policy undermines the competitiveness of STM journal publishers, and seeks additional information on the NIH Public Access Policy, PubMedCentral, and its impact on the science, technology and medical publishing fields. This is part of a broad Committee effort to review of agencies under its jurisdiction to prevent federal regulation from undermining the ability of the private sector to create or sustain jobs.
- Allan Adler Testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Government Mandates on Journal Articles -- July 2010
- Fair Copyright in Research Works Act H.R. 801
Passage of H.R. 801, the bipartisan Fair Copyright in Research Work Act is necessary to protect the copyright of private-sector research works and preserve incentives for investments in the peer-review publishing process that helps ensure the quality and integrity of scientific research.
- Federal Research Public Access Act S. 1373
Publishers have expressed opposition to the Federal Research Public Access Act, S. 1373. The bill could negatively impact the system of independent, expert peer review managed by the private sector and integral to ensuring the quality of scientific research publications. This bill is unnecessary and would impose new, costly mandates on federal agencies.
- Letter to John Holdren, Director of OSTP by Reps. Issa and Maloney regarding issues related to public information and access
- Letter from AAP & DC Principles in Opposition to the Provision Expanding the NIH Public Access Policy to other Federal Agencies in the Omnibus Appropriations Bill
- PSP submission in response to the Request for Information (RFI) Soliciting Input into the Deliberations of the Advisory Committee to the NIH Director (ACD) Working Group on the National Library of Medicine (NLM)
- PSP and STM submission in response to National Institutes of Health Request for Information (RFI): Input on Sustaining Biomedical Data Repositories
Other Legislative Initiatives
- Letter to Illinois Governor, Board of Education and University Presidents on University Open Access to Research Articles Task Force
- Letter to New York State Assemblyman Andrew Hevesi and Senator Carl L. Marcellino in Opposition to A.9126/S.7046, an Act to Establish the Taxpayer Access to Publicly Funded Research.
- Google Lawsuit
The Association of American Publishers (AAP) announced the filing of a lawsuit against Google over its plans to digitally copy and distribute copyrighted works without permission of the copyright owners.
The Association of American Publishers Professional and Scholarly Publishing division (AAP/PSP), the Association of American University Presses (AAUP), PEN American Center (PEN), and Arcade Publishing asked the court to strike down OFAC regulations that require publishers and authors to seek a license from the government to perform the routine activities necessary to publish foreign literature from embargoed countries such as Iran, Cuba, and Sudan in the United States.
- Letter to the National Economic Council and the Office of Science and Technology Policy regarding the upcoming update of the Strategy for American Innovation. The core mission of the scholarly and professional publishers is to support innovation through the communication of scholarship and technical information.
- AAP Supports Finch Report Recommendations for Sustainable Expanded Access to Scientific Publishing. Acknowledging its many similarities with the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010, the Association of American Publishers joined stakeholders across the worldwide scientific community in commending ideas set forth by the Finch Group report, the British government-funded project to identify sustainable strategies that could effectively expand access to published scientific research.
- The AAP/PSP and DC Principles Coalition for Free Access to Science submit comments in response to the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy Request for Information regarding Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting from Federally Funded Research
- The AAP/PSP submits comments in response to the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy Request for Information regarding Public Access to Digital Data Resulting from Federally Funded Research
- OSTP Request for Information on Public Access to Digital Data and Scientific Publications
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has opened a public request for information on federal access policies for scientific publication. Publishers have repeatedly expressed their concerns that a mandatory public access policy would have a negative impact on the quality and development of scientific communications, and Members of Congress have sent letters to the Administration with similar concerns about the potential of federal regulation to undermine the ability of the private sector to create or sustain jobs (see letters in The Congress above). The deadline for submission of comments is January 2, 2012, and you are encouraged to let OSTP know your thoughts on access mandates by email to email@example.com.
Report and Recommendations from the Scholarly Publishing Roundtable
In June 2009, the Committee on Science and Technology of the United States House of Representatives, in coordination with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), convened a Scholarly Publishing Roundtable to examine the current state of scholarly publishing and develop consensus recommendations for expanding public access to the journal articles arising from research funded by agencies of the United States government. The Report and Recommendations from the Scholarly Publishing Roundtable was issued in January 2010. While PSP endorses the five shared principles in the Roundtable report, PSP has expressed its reservations regarding a number of the report’s recommendations and sent a letter to The Honorable Bart Gordon, Chairman, Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives.
- White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
The OSTP issued a request for comments on December 9, 2009 on “Public Access Policies for Science and Technology Funding Agencies Across the Federal Government.” The AAP/PSP and DC Principles Coalition for Free Access to Science expressed their concerns in a submission indicating that a mandatory public access policy would have a negative impact on the quality and development of scientific communications.
- NIH Public Access Policy
Mandated in 2008, the NIH public access policy requires that authors who have received grants from NIH must deposit any ensuing manuscripts written as a result of their research to NIH’s PubMed Central for free public access within 12 months of publication. Publishers opposed the mandate and expressed concerns throughout the implementation process.